EORs VS Direct Hiring
When you step back and look at the numbers, the pattern is unmistakable: the real difference between EORs and direct hiring is time.
Offers are just the starting gun; what matters is how quickly someone actually makes it to day one. Direct hiring through a new entity often stretches into weeks or months because of banking, registrations, and payroll stabilization.
EORs, by contrast, can cut that lag to days or a few weeks, provided the candidate already has work rights.
Here’s how the two models compare side by side:
EOR vs Direct Hiring: Onboarding Time Comparison
Factor | EOR Onboarding | Direct Hiring (Entity Setup) |
---|---|---|
Typical Timeline | 2–10 days (fast cases) to 1–6 weeks depending on country & complexity | Weeks to several months due to entity formation, banking, payroll setup |
Fastest Published Case | Remote cites around 3 days once self-enrolment is complete | UK entity registration can be done in 24 hours, but banking adds weeks |
Banking / Payroll | Payroll & payment rails already in place; vendors guarantee 2–3 day payment windows | U.S. bank account takes around 3 weeks; UK non-resident banking 4 weeks–3 months; payroll stabilization 1–2 cycles |
Immigration / Work Rights | EOR cannot shorten visa/work permit timelines, still weeks to months | Same limitation; entity route also requires immigration compliance |
Compliance Tasks | EOR handles tax, statutory registrations, benefits; usually days to weeks | Company must register for taxes, benefits, labor authority filings — adds extra days/weeks |
Candidate Experience | Faster start reduces dropouts; structured onboarding linked to 82% better retention | Longer delays raise risk of reneging/ghosting (up to 50% of offers withdrawn) |
Best Use Case | Urgent hiring, market entry, distributed teams, testing new regions | Long-term presence, high-volume hiring, full local control |
The table makes the trade-off clear: EORs buy speed and flexibility, while entities buy long-term control. Neither model erases visa processing or local labor rules, but the gap in how quickly you can pay and onboard people is dramatic.
The practical takeaway for HR and business leaders is simple:
- If you need immediate capacity in a new market or want to minimize the risk of candidates backing out during long delays, an EOR is your fast-entry tool.
- If you’re planning sustained hiring at scale, building an entity in parallel is worth it, with the understanding that the first hires will take longer to get on payroll.
By using both strategies together, fast EOR onboarding now, entity setup in the background, you keep projects moving, retain talent, and avoid surprises down the road.