Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: ATS Comparison 2024

A detailed side-by-side Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse comparison to help you select the best option between these two solutions. We have considered top features, pros and cons, pricing and other details to help you choose the right solution.

HR Stacks offers comprehensive, data focused and unbiased solutions. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links

Greenhouse Logo

Greenhouse

HRS Score: 90%
Bullhorn Logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

HRS Score: 89.25%

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Overview

What is Greenhouse?

A comprehensive applicant tracking and recruitment solution for all kinds of businesses. A great tool to source the right talent for the right job.

What is Bullhorn ATS & CRM?

Comprehensive recruitment software for streamlining staffing processes and client management that comes with all important features.

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: HR Stacks Score

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse HR Stacks score based on a number of data points. We check the features, user feedback, community sentiments while adding the score. The score will give you some idea about the overall quality of the products.

Greenhouse Score

Ease of Use 88%
Features 90%
Value for Money 92%
Support 90%

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Score

Ease of Use 91%
Features 90%
Value for Money 88%
Support 88%

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Top Features

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse top features. In this list of features, we haven’t included all the features that the products has to offer. However, we tried to add the important ones to give you a competitive idea.

Top Features of Greenhouse

Applicant tracking system
Interview scheduler
Integration connections
Matching algorithms
Reporting dashboards
Referral rewards programs
Job post publisher
Document templates
Customize user experience
Task automation

Top Features of Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Email and Calendar Integration
Reporting and Analytics Tools
Workflow Automation Option
Cloud-based Access
Job Order Management
Resume Parsing
Candidate Search and Match
Customizable Dashboards
Candidate Pipeline Management
Compliance Management
Candidate and Client Portals
Task and Reminder Management
Role-based Access Controls

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Company Profile

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse, some of the important points about the product company to giev you an idea about the strength of the company behind the product. It will also give you an idea about the stability of the product.

Greenhouse Company Profile

Co Name: Greenhouse Software, Inc
HQ: New York, United States
Est Year: 2012
Company Size
501-1000 employees
Website

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Company Profile

Co Name: Bullhorn Inc.
HQ: Massachusetts, United States
Est Year: 1999
Company Size
1001-5000 employees
Website

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Pricing Comparison

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse pricing comparison. The pricing is one of the most important aspect to look at when we compare two products. It can be an important aspect to make a decision.

Greenhouse Pricing Details

Free Version: No

Free Trail: No

Starting Price: Custom

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Pricing Details

Free Version: No

Free Trail: Yes

Starting Price: Custom

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Pros & Cons

Greenhouse Pros & Cons

Pros of Greenhouse

People-First Approach
Data-Driven Insights
Holistic Talent Management
Market-Leading Functionality
Flexible Customization Options
Comprehensive Compliance Features

Cons of Greenhouse

Learning Curve
Specialized Pricing
Growth challenges

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Pros & Cons

Pros of Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User-friendly Interface, intuitive and easy to navigate.
Comprehensive ATS and CRM system.
Option ot automate repetitive tasks.
Cloud-based accessibility
Seamlessly integrates with different tools.
Robust reporting for better decision making

Cons of Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Can be expensive, particularly for smaller businesses.
Limited customization possibilities.
Steep learning curve for advanced features.

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse: Demo

Understand the products better by checking the demo videos listed below. 

Greenhouse Demo Video

Bullhorn ATS & CRM Demo Video

Both Bullhorn and Greenhouse are popular Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) that cater to different types of recruiting needs. While Bullhorn is more focused on staffing and recruiting agencies, Greenhouse is designed for in-house talent acquisition teams.

Overview:

  • Bullhorn is a cloud-based solution, primarily catering to the staffing industry. It offers a wide range of tools for managing candidates, clients, and job orders, and is known for its powerful CRM integration.
  • Greenhouse, on the other hand, focuses on helping businesses manage their internal hiring processes. It is widely used by companies aiming to improve their recruiting strategies with structured hiring practices and data-driven decision-making.

Key Differences

1. Target Audience

  • Bullhorn: Primarily for staffing and recruiting agencies. It handles the entire recruitment lifecycle, including job orders, client relationship management, and payroll.
  • Greenhouse: Designed for in-house recruiting teams in companies looking to streamline their hiring process. It’s suitable for startups to enterprise-level businesses.

2. User Interface & Ease of Use

  • Bullhorn: Provides a feature-rich interface with customization options but may feel overwhelming to users new to the staffing industry. It has a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of functionalities.
  • Greenhouse: Known for its user-friendly interface. It focuses on structured workflows, making it easier for recruiters to collaborate and ensure a consistent hiring process.

3. Features

  • Bullhorn: Offers advanced CRM tools, automated workflows, candidate management, interview scheduling, and deep reporting features. It is particularly strong in managing large candidate databases and tracking multiple job orders.
  • Greenhouse: Emphasizes structured hiring with features like interview scorecards, customizable hiring stages, and robust collaboration tools for internal teams. Its analytics capabilities allow for better hiring decisions based on data.

Bullhorn vs. Greenhouse: Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureBullhornGreenhouse
Target AudienceStaffing & recruiting agenciesIn-house recruiting teams
Ease of UseMore complex, steep learning curveUser-friendly, easy to navigate
Key FeaturesCRM, automated workflows, deep reportingStructured hiring, scorecards, analytics
Integration OptionsExtensive CRM and external tool integrationStrong HR and sourcing tool integration
CustomizationHighly customizable for agenciesCustomizable hiring workflows
PricingHigher pricing for advanced featuresFlexible pricing based on company size
Support & TrainingComprehensive but response times may varyKnown for excellent support and resources
Best ForRecruitment agencies managing large databasesCompanies aiming for structured hiring

Conclusion:

  • Bullhorn is the right choice if you’re a staffing agency that needs an ATS with CRM functionalities to manage candidates and client relationships. It’s robust but requires time to master.
  • Greenhouse is ideal for companies focused on internal recruiting with an emphasis on structured, data-driven hiring. It’s easy to use, integrates well with HR systems, and supports collaborative hiring processes.

Ultimately, your choice depends on whether you’re managing a recruitment agency’s operations or an internal hiring team’s workflow.

Bullhorn Vs. Greenhouse Comparison FAQs

Bullhorn is the better choice for staffing agencies. It’s specifically designed for recruitment firms and offers robust client and candidate relationship management (CRM) features that streamline the recruitment process, including job order management and reporting tools.
Yes, Greenhouse is suitable for companies of all sizes, from startups to large enterprises. It’s particularly helpful for organizations looking to standardize their hiring process, ensure consistent interview practices, and make data-driven decisions.
Bullhorn has extensive integrations with CRM systems, marketing platforms, background checks, and payroll systems, which is beneficial for staffing agencies. Greenhouse offers integrations with HR software, sourcing tools, onboarding solutions, and job boards, making it ideal for internal hiring teams.

Related Comparisons

Deel vs. HiBob

Deel vs. HiBob

Lattice vs. ThriveSparrow

Lattice vs. ThriveSparrow

Lattice vs. WorkTango

Lattice vs. WorkTango

Lattice vs. Motivosity

Lattice vs. Motivosity

Lattice vs. Workhuman

Lattice vs Workhuman

Lattice vs. UKG Pro

Lattice vs. UKG Pro

Lattice vs. Isolved

Lattice vs. Isolved

Lattice vs. Deel

Lattice vs. Deel

HR Stacks uses cookies

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.