jobvite_logo

10 Best Jobvite Alternatives & Competitors 2026

Looking for the best Jobvite alternatives? we have listed some of the top products with similar features in this post. Products like Greenhouse, Workable, JobDiva are some of the regularly mentioned alternatives to Jobvite. Let’s look at the complete list.

HR Stacks offers comprehensive, data focused and unbiased solutions. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links

Jobvite is an applicant tracking system built to manage recruiting workflows end to end, from job posting and sourcing through interviews, offers, and hiring analytics. It fits best in mid-sized to larger organizations that want a structured process, formal approvals, and clear reporting across teams. In practice, it’s often adopted by TA teams that already operate with defined stages and compliance expectations.

Progressively, teams tend to feel friction around configuration complexity, slower iteration on workflows, and dependence on admin support for changes. Reporting flexibility and integration depth can also feel limiting once hiring volume or specialization increases. Those pressures are usually what push companies to explore alternatives. The table below isn’t about better or worse, it’s a quick way to see which direction teams typically move when Jobvite stops fitting cleanly.

Comparison Table: Jobvite Vs. Alternatives

Product NameBest For Compared to JobviteKey AdvantageKey Limitation
WorkableSmaller teams wanting faster setupQuicker deployment with less process overheadLess depth for complex enterprise workflows
GreenhouseTeams doubling down on structured hiringStrong interview consistency and process controlHeavier process discipline required
Bullhorn ATS & CRMStaffing and recruiting agenciesATS and CRM combined in one systemLess suited for internal corporate hiring
JobDivaHigh-volume staffing firmsDeep automation for agency recruitingSteep learning curve outside staffing
Zoho RecruitCost-conscious teams already in ZohoTight ecosystem integrationLimited flexibility at scale
ManatalLean teams modernizing from spreadsheetsClean UI with AI-assisted sourcingShallower reporting than Jobvite
RecruiteeCollaborative hiring culturesSimple, team-friendly workflowsLess robust compliance tooling
iCIMS Talent CloudLarge enterprises with complex needsBroad talent suite beyond ATSSlower to adapt and heavier admin load
Recruit CRMBoutique agenciesBalanced ATS + CRM without enterprise weightNot designed for corporate TA teams
ZipRecruiterSourcing-first teamsMassive candidate reachWeak downstream hiring management

Our Top Jobvite Alternatives Picks: Quick List

Bullhorn Logo
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
0.0
Starting Price
Custom
HR Stacks Score
89.25%
Manatal Logo
Manatal
0.0
Starting Price
$15/User/Month
HR Stacks Score
91.25%
Zoho Recruit Logo
Zoho Recruit
0.0
Starting Price
$25/User/Month
HR Stacks Score
90.75%
Workable Logo
Workable
0.0
Starting Price
$189/Month
HR Stacks Score
92.5%
Greenhouse Logo
Greenhouse
4.7
Starting Price
Custom
HR Stacks Score
90%
JobDiva Logo
JobDiva
0.0
Starting Price
Custom
HR Stacks Score
89.5%
Recruitee Logo
Recruitee
4.7
Starting Price
$199/Month
HR Stacks Score
91%
iCIMS Talent Cloud logo
iCIMS Talent Cloud
0.0
Starting Price
Custom Pricing
HR Stacks Score
90.5%
Recruit CRM Logo
Recruit CRM
0.0
Starting Price
$85/Month
HR Stacks Score
92.5%
ZipRecruiter Logo
ZipRecruiter
0.0
Starting Price
$299
HR Stacks Score
91.5%

Best Jobvite Alternatives In Detail

Let's understand each of the Jobvite alternatives in detail and why we selected the product as one of the alternatives and what it has to offer.
Bullhorn Logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: Custom

Bullhorn enters the conversation when Jobvite is being stretched into agency-style recruiting. It’s designed for staffing and recruiting firms that need both candidate tracking and client management in one place. Buyers must be comfortable treating recruiting like sales operations. After rollout, internal HR teams often realize it’s overbuilt for corporate hiring compared to Jobvite.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Bullhorn combines ATS and CRM, which matters if placements and clients drive revenue.
  • Jobvite is cleaner for internal approvals, while Bullhorn optimizes for pipeline velocity.
  • Reporting focuses on recruiter productivity and placements, not employer branding or DEI.
  • It works well for agencies, but feels awkward for internal TA teams.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.2/51,100+
Capterra4.1/5900+
Pros
User-friendly Interface, intuitive and easy to navigate.
Comprehensive ATS and CRM system.
Option ot automate repetitive tasks.
Cloud-based accessibility
Seamlessly integrates with different tools.
Robust reporting for better decision making
Cons
Can be expensive, particularly for smaller businesses.
Limited customization possibilities.
Steep learning curve for advanced features.
Manatal Logo

Manatal

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $15/User/Month

Manatal tends to replace Jobvite for lean teams wanting a modern interface without enterprise weight. It’s common among startups and small agencies. Buyers assume they won’t need advanced analytics or layered approvals. After adoption, teams sometimes miss the depth Jobvite provided once volume increases.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Manatal is faster to learn and easier to maintain.
  • AI-assisted sourcing is more visible, though not always more effective.
  • Reports are easy to read, but don’t go very deep.
  • It works well early, but maturity gaps show later.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.6/5500+
Capterra4.7/5400+
Pros
User-friendly and easy-to-use interface
Powerful applicant tracking features
AI and automation tools to enhance recruiting
Integration with LinkedIn and 2500+ job boards
Compliant with global privacy regulations
Mobile application for accessibility on the go
Good support and customer success resources
Cons
No language options other than English currently
Additional custom features may require custom pricing
Missing integrations with some specialized tools
Zoho Recruit Logo

Zoho Recruit

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $25/User/Month

Zoho Recruit is usually considered when budget or ecosystem alignment matters more than depth. It’s chosen by small teams already invested in Zoho tools who find Jobvite too heavy. The assumption is that tight integration outweighs best-in-class recruiting features. Over time, reporting and workflow limits become noticeable as hiring scales.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Zoho Recruit is significantly cheaper, which matters for early-stage or cost-sensitive teams.
  • Jobvite handles complex workflows more gracefully.
  • Customization relies on Zoho’s broader platform rather than native recruiting logic.
  • It works well if hiring stays simple, but strains under growth.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.1/5600+
Capterra4.2/5800+
Pros
Zoho Recruit is highly customizable to make it fit your unique needs.
Zoho Recruit seamlessly integrates with other Zoho and third-party apps
Zoho Recruit comes with user-friendly interface
Comes with affordable pricing plans (Good for SMBs)
Workflow automation and robust feature set
Cons
Users complain about outdated design elements
Limitation in customer support
Workable Logo

Workable

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $189/Month

Workable usually comes up when teams want something simpler than Jobvite without abandoning structure altogether. It’s commonly chosen by small to mid-sized companies that don’t want a long implementation or a dedicated system admin. Buyers tend to assume they’ll trade some depth for speed, especially around customization and reporting. After go-live, teams often notice that advanced workflows or edge-case approvals require workarounds rather than configuration.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Workable prioritizes quick setup and ease of use, which matters if Jobvite feels longer adapting to changing hiring plans.
  • Hiring managers find it easier to use, but weaker control over hiring steps.
  • Reporting is easier to access day one, but doesn’t go as deep as Jobvite’s analytics once hiring volume grows.
  • Works well if recruiting is steady and predictable, but becomes limiting when roles or approval paths multiply.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.4/51,400+
Capterra4.5/51,300+
Pros
AI-powered candidate matching and sourcing tools
Sophisticated reporting and analytics dashboards
Seamless LinkedIn and other platform integrations
Customizable workflows and automations
Robust referral program management
Cons
Pricing can increase significantly for large enterprises
Learning curve for configuring all customization options
Limited customization features
Greenhouse Logo

Greenhouse

4.7 (based on 3 reviews)
Free Trial: No
Starting Price: Custom

Greenhouse is often evaluated when teams want more rigor than Jobvite provides around interview structure and hiring consistency. It’s typically selected by scaling companies that are hiring aggressively and want repeatable, defensible processes. The assumption buyers make is that everyone will follow the system closely, from recruiters to interviewers. Post-implementation, the trade-off shows up in flexibility; ad hoc hiring or exceptions tend to feel harder than they did in Jobvite.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Strong interview structure supports fair, consistent hiring.
  • More fixed setup than Jobvite, less room to customize.
  • Reports focus on interviews, not full recruiting view.
  • Works with strict leadership, frustrates flexible teams.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.5/52,200+
Capterra4.4/51,000+
Pros
People-First Approach
Data-Driven Insights
Holistic Talent Management
Market-Leading Functionality
Flexible Customization Options
Comprehensive Compliance Features
Cons
Learning Curve
Specialized Pricing
Growth challenges
JobDiva Logo

JobDiva

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: Custom

JobDiva is another alternative that comes up when Jobvite is used in high-volume staffing environments. It’s most common among large recruiting agencies with heavy automation needs. Buyers assume a steep learning curve in exchange for power. Once live, teams often accept that flexibility and ease of use are secondary to throughput.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • JobDiva automates sourcing and submissions far beyond what Jobvite offers.
  • The system expects trained users, unlike Jobvite’s broader hiring-manager friendliness.
  • Customization is powerful but rarely intuitive.
  • It works well at scale, but slows down smaller teams.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.1/5700+
Capterra4.0/5600+
Pros
Comprehensive ATS, CRM, and VMS in one platform
Advanced resume aggregation and AI-driven search
Mobile app allows for work on the go
Scalable solution suitable for businesses of all sizes
Real-time updates and insights
Cons
Steep learning curve due to the extensive range of features
Higher pricing compared to simpler ATS solutions
Recruitee Logo

Recruitee

4.7 (based on 3 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $199/Month

Recruitee is usually considered when teams feel Jobvite is too rigid for day-to-day hiring. It’s popular with mid-sized, modern teams that want recruiters and hiring managers working closely together. Buyers generally assume collaboration matters more than strict process control. After rollout, teams often notice gaps around compliance, advanced approvals, and complex reporting.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Recruitee emphasizes team participation over strict workflows.
  • Jobvite offers stronger enterprise controls.
  • Custom pipelines are easier to adjust on the fly.
  • It works well if culture drives hiring, not policy.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.5/51,000+
Capterra4.6/51,200+
Pros
A collaborative approach improves team productivity
Automated processes save substantial time
Robust applicant tracking and insights
Strong sourcing and social integration capabilities
Seamless support for growing business needs
Competitive pricing with flexible plans
Cons
The learning curve for some advanced features
Limited customization compared to some competitors
Support for lesser-known integrations could be improved
iCIMS Talent Cloud logo

iCIMS Talent Cloud

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: No
Starting Price: Custom Pricing

iCIMS is evaluated when Jobvite no longer feels enterprise-grade enough. It’s selected by large organizations with layered compliance and global hiring. Buyers accept longer implementations and heavier admin work. After rollout, agility is often the price paid.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • iCIMS supports broader talent operations beyond recruiting.
  • Configuration is deeper but slower to change.
  • Reporting spans multiple talent functions.
  • It works well at scale, but feels heavy day to day.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.1/51,500+
Capterra4.2/51,100+
Pros
Easy to use
Seamless technological integration
Customisation of services is possible
Customer support is good
Cons
Can be slightly intimidating for beginners
Connecting with other databases can take a little more time
Better fit for medium to large sized organisations
Recruit CRM Logo

Recruit CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $85/Month

Recruit CRM is usually evaluated when Jobvite feels too heavy for agency-style recruiting. It’s commonly chosen by boutique staffing firms that need ATS and CRM in one system. Buyers assume internal HR workflows won’t be the primary focus. Over time, corporate approvals, branding, and reporting feel limited compared to Jobvite.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • Built for agencies, not internal corporate hiring teams.
  • Combines ATS and CRM without enterprise process complexity.
  • Faster setup than Jobvite, but fewer workflow controls.
  • Works well for placements, weak for structured HR processes.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.8/51,300+
Capterra4.7/5900+
Pros
24/7 assistance is available
Live demo sessions can be booked
Custom features can be added
AI GPT integration is possible
Drag and drop kanban boards are available
Cons
Customisable reporting is missing
Not suitable for in-house hiring
More interactive features can be added
Compliance features can be added
Best for small and medium sized recruiters
ZipRecruiter Logo

ZipRecruiter

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $299

ZipRecruiter isn’t a full Jobvite replacement, but it’s often considered when sourcing is the main pain point. It’s used by teams that feel Jobvite doesn’t deliver enough candidate flow. The assumption is that ATS depth is secondary. After use, teams still need another system to manage hiring properly.

How it differs from Jobvite

  • ZipRecruiter focuses on reach, not workflow.
  • Jobvite manages the hiring lifecycle more completely.
  • Candidate volume is higher, but relevance varies.
  • It works well for sourcing bursts, not end-to-end hiring.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.4/56,000+
Trustpilot4.2/510,000+
Pros
AI matching technology
Seamless Connectivity with a large pool of people
Job-specific templates accessible
Dedicated support available 24x7
Cons
Slightly expensive daily job posting plans
Free trial days are only four
Preferred portal for small and medium business ventures mostly

FAQs: Jobvite Alternatives

It’s mid-to-high range. You’re paying for structure and reporting. Teams replacing it usually do so to simplify, not to save a small amount.
Candidate data moves cleanly. Workflow logic and reporting rarely do. Plan time for rethinking process, not just exporting records.
If you already have defined stages, approvals, and reporting tied into leadership reviews, switching often creates more disruption than value.
It can support global hiring, but setup and maintenance get heavy fast. Multiple regions, rules, and stakeholders usually mean more admin effort than teams expect.
Mid-sized companies that add regions, business units, or hiring models tend to hit limits first. Complexity grows faster than the system’s flexibility.
Usually, yes. Unless compliance or reporting is a hard requirement, lighter tools move faster early on.
Manjuri Dutta
Manjuri Dutta

Manjuri Dutta is the co-founder and Content Editor of HR Stacks, a leading HR tech and workforce management review platform, and EmployerRecords.com, specializing in Employer-of-Record services for global hiring. She brings a thoughtful and expert voice to articles designed to inform HR leaders, practitioners, and tech buyers alike.

Get HR Stacks Weekly
Get our weekly news update with all latest news in HR community.

Featured HR Products

Pebl Logo
Pebl
Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) is a leader...
Deel Logo
Deel
Deel is a well-recognized all-in-one HR solution...
usemultiplier_logo
Multiplier
Multiplier is an emerging global employment platform...
When I Work Logo
When I Work
When I Work is a scheduling tool...
Connecteam Logo
Connecteam
Connecteam is an all-in-one employee management platform...

Recently Added Alternative Posts

Connecteam Logo

Connecteam

10 Alternatives Listed
Connecteam sits in that sweet spot for teams that want...
Agile Hero Logo

Agile Hero

10 Alternatives Listed
Agile Hero is built for teams that want a simple,...
Recruitee Logo

Recruitee

15 Alternatives Listed
Recruitee sits in that sweet spot where lean recruiting teams...
Receive the latest HR news

Subscribe To Our Weekly HR Newsletter

Get the latest from the HR & AI tech industry. All your news at one place. 

HR Stacks uses cookies

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.