Asana Logo

10 Best Asana Alternatives & Competitors 2026

If you’re comparing top Asana alternatives, this list covers tools teams usually look at when task tracking starts to feel limiting. Asana works well for coordination, but these options fit better when work becomes sales-driven, process-heavy, or role-specific.

HR Stacks offers comprehensive, data focused and unbiased solutions. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links

Asana is a work management tool used to plan projects, assign tasks, track progress, and keep teams aligned on day-to-day execution. It fits best for cross-functional teams that need structure without heavy process, especially in marketing, operations, and product teams at small to mid-sized companies.

Over time, teams often hit friction around reporting depth, workflow rigidity, and the effort required to keep Asana clean as complexity grows. Others struggle when sales, CRM, or time tracking needs creep in and Asana starts getting stretched beyond its original purpose. Those gaps usually push teams to look elsewhere, not because Asana is broken, but because the work has changed. The comparison below is meant to show different directions teams take depending on what they need next, not a simple upgrade path.

Comparison Table: Asana Vs. Alternatives

Product NameBest For Compared to AsanaKey AdvantageKey Limitation
monday.comTeams wanting more visual control than AsanaHighly flexible boards that adapt to many workflowsCan feel busy and over-configured
Close CRMSales teams outgrowing task-based tracking in AsanaBuilt for deal execution, not general projectsNot suitable for non-sales work
Zoho CRMCost-conscious teams replacing Asana with CRM-driven workflowsBroad suite coverage at lower price pointsUX and setup complexity
WrikeEnterprise teams finding Asana too lightweightStrong workload and resource controlsHeavier onboarding and admin effort
JiraEngineering teams forcing Asana to behave like JiraDeep issue tracking and sprint managementSteep learning curve for non-tech teams
TogglTeams using Asana but missing time visibilityNative time tracking focusWeak project dependency handling
PipedriveSales teams tracking pipelines in AsanaClear deal flow and forecastingLimited beyond sales execution
HubSpot CRMGrowing teams combining tasks with CRM needsUnified CRM with automationCosts rise quickly as usage grows
Recruit CRMRecruiting teams managing pipelines in AsanaATS + CRM in one systemNarrow use outside hiring
OnePageCRMSmall sales teams overwhelmed by AsanaAction-focused sales executionMinimal customization depth

Our Top Asana Alternatives Picks: Quick List

zoho-crm-logo
Zoho CRM
0.0
Starting Price
$14/Month
HR Stacks Score
90.75%
Monday.com Logo
monday.com
4.5
Starting Price
$9/User
HR Stacks Score
90%
Close-CRM-Logo
Close CRM
0.0
Starting Price
$49/Month
HR Stacks Score
89.75%
Wrike Logo
Wrike
0.0
Starting Price
$10
HR Stacks Score
90.5%
Jira Logo
Jira
0.0
Starting Price
$7.53
HR Stacks Score
90.5%
Toggl Logo
Toggl
0.0
Starting Price
$10
HR Stacks Score
90.5%
Pipedrive-Logo
Pipedrive
5.0
Starting Price
$9.90/Month
HR Stacks Score
90.5%
HubSpot Logo
HubSpot CRM
0.0
Starting Price
$20
HR Stacks Score
89-91%
Recruit CRM Logo
Recruit CRM
0.0
Starting Price
$85/Month
HR Stacks Score
92.5%
onepagecrm-logo
OnePageCRM
0.0
Starting Price
$9.95/Month
HR Stacks Score
91.25%

Best Asana Alternatives In Detail

Let's understand each of the Asana alternatives in detail and why we selected the product as one of the alternatives and what it has to offer.
zoho-crm-logo

Zoho CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Array
Starting Price: $14/Month

Zoho CRM comes into the picture when teams try to replace Asana with something that handles customers, deals, and internal follow-ups in one place. It’s often selected by small to mid-sized businesses that want breadth without paying enterprise prices. Buyers need to be comfortable with configuration-heavy setups and a UI that isn’t as clean as Asana’s. Over time, teams feel the trade-off between cost savings and usability, especially during training.

How it differs from Asana

  • Zoho CRM assumes customer-driven workflows, while Asana assumes internal task execution.
  • The platform offers far more modules, which matters if you’re consolidating tools.
  • Reporting is deeper than Asana’s but takes more effort to configure correctly.
  • It works if you accept complexity upfront; it struggles when teams expect Asana-level simplicity.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.1/52,500+
Capterra4.3/56,000+
Pros
Filters hot leads and cold leads for better lead conversion
Real-time data and insights for analysis
Process automation solution
Automated chatbot option
Supports plenty of plugins
Easy-to-use user-interface
Efficient contact and task management
Cons
The dashboard works slow
Mobile version of Zoho CRM does not support all the features
Customization features are limited
Monday.com Logo

monday.com

4.5 (based on 2 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $9/User

monday.com usually comes up when teams like Asana’s flexibility but want more control over how work is visualized and automated. I see it adopted by operations-heavy teams or agencies that manage many parallel workflows and want each one to look different. You need to be comfortable designing your own structure, because monday.com doesn’t push a “right” way to work. After go-live, teams sometimes realize they’ve built something powerful but also fragile, especially if ownership isn’t clear.

How it differs from Asana

  • monday.com leans much harder into configurable boards, which matters if Asana’s task lists feel too rigid
  • Automation rules are more accessible than in Asana, but they also encourage complexity
  • Reporting is more visual and customizable, which works well if leadership wants dashboards without exporting data.
  • It works well if you have someone internally who enjoys owning systems; it becomes limiting when no one maintains structure.
  • Compared to Asana’s opinionated task model, monday.com trades clarity for flexibility.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.7/59,000+
Capterra4.6/54,500+
Pros
Highly customizable to specific needs
Powerful automation reduces manual work
Centralized platform for all HR functions
Real-time dashboard for tracking KPIs
Collaborative workspace for teams
Seamless integrations with other apps
Support for both desktop and mobile use
Cons
The steep learning curve for some features
Limited pre-defined templates for HR
It is not as powerful as specialist HR software
Close-CRM-Logo

Close CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $49/Month

Close CRM shows up when sales teams have been using Asana as a workaround for deal tracking and finally hit the wall. It’s typically chosen by inside sales teams that care more about speed and calling than project hygiene. You have to be comfortable separating sales execution from broader project work, because Close doesn’t try to replace Asana across the company. The trade-off appears when teams expect cross-team visibility that Close simply isn’t built to provide.

How it differs from Asana

  • Close is deal-centric, not task-centric, which matters if your “projects” are actually sales opportunities.
  • Communication tools are built into the workflow, unlike Asana where context lives in comments.
  • Asana handles cross-functional collaboration better; Close assumes a sales-only environment.
  • It works well if sales owns its own systems; it breaks down when sales and ops need one shared workspace.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.7/51,500+
Capterra4.6/5900+
Pros
Automated email sequences
Easy to import leads
History of interaction with customers
Good integration with the email system
Smart views for custom filtering and lead sorting
Cons
Low-quality call audio
Lacks customization option
Wrike Logo

Wrike

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $10

Wrike usually replaces Asana when teams grow large enough that “who’s overloaded” becomes a real problem. I see it most in enterprise marketing, PMOs, or services teams with formal resourcing needs. You have to be comfortable with a more structured rollout and ongoing admin work. After implementation, teams sometimes miss Asana’s lighter feel, especially for quick collaboration.

How it differs from Asana

  • Wrike prioritizes workload management, which Asana only partially supports.
  • Permissions and governance are much stronger, useful in regulated environments.
  • Setup is heavier, but that’s the cost of scale and control.
  • It works well if projects are repeatable; it slows down ad hoc work.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.2/53,500+
Capterra4.3/52,000+
Pros
Real-time collaboration and updates
Clean, user-friendly interface
Strong automation features
Great integrations with popular tools
Visual project tracking (Gantt charts, dashboards)
Built-in time tracking
Cons
Some advanced features are locked behind higher plans
Mobile app isn't as smooth as desktop
Limited offline functionality
Learning curve for new users
Jira Logo

Jira

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $7.53

Jira comes up when engineering teams are forcing Asana to behave like an issue tracker. It’s chosen by product and development teams that live in sprints, backlogs, and releases. You need to accept that Jira speaks a different language than Asana, and not everyone will love it. The trade-off is collaboration with non-technical teams, which often becomes harder.

How it differs from Asana

  • Jira is built around issues and workflows, not general tasks.
  • Reporting is extremely powerful but assumes process discipline.
  • Asana is easier for non-engineers; Jira doesn’t try to be.
  • Works well if engineering drives tooling decisions; struggles when used company-wide.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.3/55,000+
Capterra4.4/514,000+
Pros
Highly customizable workflows to fit different team needs.
Strong integration with other tools like Confluence, Slack, and Bitbucket.
Powerful automation reduces repetitive tasks.
Agile-friendly with Scrum and Kanban boards.
Cloud-based access for remote teams.
Cons
Steep learning curve for new users.
Performance can slow down with large datasets.
Pricing may be high for small teams.
Some integrations require additional costs.
Toggl Logo

Toggl

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $10

Toggl is usually added, or replaces parts of Asana, when time tracking becomes the priority. Agencies and consultancies choose it when Asana’s time visibility isn’t enough. You have to be okay running projects lightly, because Toggl focuses on time first, structure second. Over time, teams realize they may still need Asana alongside it.

How it differs from Asana

  • Toggl centers everything around time entries, not tasks.
  • Reporting is excellent for billable analysis, weaker for project dependencies.
  • Asana is better for planning; Toggl is better for measurement.
  • Works well if utilization matters more than task orchestration.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.6/51,200+
Capterra4.7/52,300+
Pros
Simple and intuitive interface, no learning curve.
One-click time tracking with automatic reminders.
Detailed reports for productivity insights and billing.
Works seamlessly for individuals and teams.
Syncs across devices for easy access anywhere.
No need for constant manual time entry.
Cons
Free version has limited features.
Lacks advanced invoicing tools.
Can feel overwhelming with too many tracked tasks.
Some integrations require premium plans.
No built-in payroll processing.
Pipedrive-Logo

Pipedrive

5.0 (based on 1 reviews)
Free Trial: Array
Starting Price: $9.90/Month

Pipedrive replaces Asana when sales teams want to stop managing deals as tasks. It’s typically adopted by SMB sales teams that want clarity without CRM bloat. You must be comfortable keeping non-sales work elsewhere. The trade-off shows up when teams want deeper automation or cross-team workflows.

How it differs from Asana

  • Pipedrive is pipeline-first, while Asana is task-first.
  • Forecasting is native, not bolted on.
  • Asana supports collaboration better outside sales.
  • Works best if sales is the main driver of work.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.3/52,800+
Capterra4.5/53,000+
Pros
Easy to use interface
Improves critical sales procedures
Process automation
Email campaigns and communications
Perfect API for extracting meaningful data
Organizes all the sales activities
Readily monitors each transaction and account
Cons
Maintaining email on the mobile app is challenging
Tracking ability of pending activities is poor
Few of the supported integrations are not up to the mark
HubSpot Logo

HubSpot CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $20

HubSpot CRM comes up when teams want to replace Asana with something tied to revenue and customers. It’s common in growing companies standardizing on HubSpot across marketing and sales. You need to be comfortable with pricing that grows as usage deepens. Over time, some teams miss Asana’s neutral project space.

How it differs from Asana

  • HubSpot ties tasks directly to contacts and deals.
  • Automation is stronger but gated behind higher tiers.
  • Asana is better for internal operations work.
  • Works well if customer lifecycle drives most tasks.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.4/510,000+
Capterra4.5/54,000+
Pros
User-friendly interface
Easy contact and deal tracking
Built-in email and meeting tools
Seamless integration with marketing tools
Customizable sales pipelines
Cons
Limited customization in free version
Reporting tools can be basic for complex needs
Can get expensive as team size grows
Learning curve for full suite integration
Recruit CRM Logo

Recruit CRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $85/Month

Recruit CRM replaces Asana when recruiting teams are tired of hacking project boards into candidate pipelines. It’s chosen by staffing firms and in-house recruiters who want structure fast. You need to accept that it’s purpose-built, not flexible like Asana. The trade-off is that it won’t support broader company work.

How it differs from Asana

  • Recruit CRM is built specifically around candidate pipelines and hiring stages.
  • Tasks are always tied to candidates, clients, or job requisitions.
  • Asana offers flexibility; Recruit CRM enforces recruiting-specific structure.
  • Works best when hiring is core business, not a support function.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.7/51,000+
Capterra4.8/5300+
Pros
24/7 assistance is available
Live demo sessions can be booked
Custom features can be added
AI GPT integration is possible
Drag and drop kanban boards are available
Cons
Customisable reporting is missing
Not suitable for in-house hiring
More interactive features can be added
Compliance features can be added
Best for small and medium sized recruiters
onepagecrm-logo

OnePageCRM

0.0 (based on 0 reviews)
Free Trial: Yes
Starting Price: $9.95/Month

OnePageCRM shows up when small sales teams find Asana overwhelming for simple follow-ups. It’s often adopted by founders or lean sales teams who want focus, not dashboards. You must be comfortable with minimal customization. Over time, teams outgrow it as complexity increases

How it differs from Asana

  • OnePageCRM centers work around daily sales actions, not projects.
  • The system prioritizes follow-ups over planning and collaboration.
  • Asana supports complex workflows; OnePageCRM intentionally limits scope.
  • Customization is minimal compared to Asana’s flexible task model.
  • Works well for solo sellers; breaks down as teams scale.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

PlatformRatingReviews Analyzed
G24.7/5400+
Capterra4.6/5150+
Pros
Very simple to use (no training required)
Affordable pricing (incl. 21-day free trial)
Action Stream and other unique features
Comprehensive email management
Multiple automation features
Cons
No free version
Not suitable for large enterprises

FAQs: Asana Alternatives

Yes, up to a point. In my experience, it works well until reporting, resourcing, or specialized workflows become non-negotiable.
Tactically, exporting tasks is easy. The real work is redefining workflows so you don’t recreate the same problems elsewhere.
If your issues are mostly about discipline and adoption, not missing functionality, switching tools won’t fix that.
It works early on, but it’s usually a stopgap. Purpose-built CRMs or ATS tools age better.
Asana is fairly priced for what it does. Costs rise when teams bolt on other tools to fill gaps.
No. The right move depends on whether your work is project-driven, revenue-driven, or time-driven.
Manjuri Dutta
Manjuri Dutta

Manjuri Dutta is the co-founder and Content Editor of HR Stacks, a leading HR tech and workforce management review platform, and EmployerRecords.com, specializing in Employer-of-Record services for global hiring. She brings a thoughtful and expert voice to articles designed to inform HR leaders, practitioners, and tech buyers alike.

Get HR Stacks Weekly
Get our weekly news update with all latest news in HR community.

Featured HR Products

Pebl Logo
Pebl
Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) is a leader...
Deel Logo
Deel
Deel is a well-recognized all-in-one HR solution...
usemultiplier_logo
Multiplier
Multiplier is an emerging global employment platform...
When I Work Logo
When I Work
When I Work is a scheduling tool...
Connecteam Logo
Connecteam
Connecteam is an all-in-one employee management platform...

Recently Added Alternative Posts

Connecteam Logo

Connecteam

10 Alternatives Listed
Connecteam sits in that sweet spot for teams that want...
Agile Hero Logo

Agile Hero

10 Alternatives Listed
Agile Hero is built for teams that want a simple,...
Recruitee Logo

Recruitee

15 Alternatives Listed
Recruitee sits in that sweet spot where lean recruiting teams...
Receive the latest HR news

Subscribe To Our Weekly HR Newsletter

Get the latest from the HR & AI tech industry. All your news at one place. 

HR Stacks uses cookies

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.