10 Best Connecteam Alternatives & Competitors 2026

When I Work shows up in the conversation whenever teams want a more polished scheduling experience. It’s well-liked by shift-driven companies that need fast schedule creation and quick messaging between managers and staff.

Folks switch to it from Connecteam when they want something more focused on scheduling rather than a broad operational suite.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Scheduling automations are stronger here, good for teams with rotating rosters.
• Connecteam’s task and workflow tools go deeper; When I Work keeps its feature set narrower.
• Messaging feels quicker and more “live” in When I Work, useful for hourly teams swapping shifts.
• When I Work doesn’t try to cover broader operations like Connecteam does, which can simplify onboarding.
• Connecteam has more customizable forms; When I Work is mainly about schedules and time.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.4 (850 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 3.8 (210 reviews analyzed)

Homebase tends to come up when small retail or hospitality teams want something lighter than Connecteam and don’t need the broader operations toolkit.

It handles scheduling and time tracking without much fuss, and the free tier makes it appealing for small shops trying to organize their team for the first time. A lot of owners like that employees pick it up quickly with minimal training.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Homebase leans harder into very small business workflows; Connecteam scales better once multiple locations enter the picture.
• Scheduling in Homebase is fast, but Connecteam’s task tools and communication options give managers more control.
• Homebase offers payroll integrations but not the operational breadth Connecteam bundles in.
• Connecteam provides a more unified environment for training and forms, which Homebase doesn’t try to match.
• Homebase feels simpler on day one; Connecteam becomes more valuable once complexity grows.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.2 (650 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.0 (420 reviews analyzed)

Deputy comes into play when labor compliance and forecasting start mattering more than simplicity. Larger restaurants, retail groups, and franchises tend to weigh it against Connecteam because Deputy handles scheduling rules at a deeper level. In bigger teams, managers appreciate the visibility it gives into coverage and cost.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Deputy’s labor modeling is significantly more advanced; Connecteam keeps this lightweight.
• Connecteam is easier for frontline teams switching from pen-and-paper processes.
• Deputy integrates tightly with payroll providers, which helps high-volume hourly teams.
• Connecteam covers more of the “day-to-day operations” outside of scheduling.
• With Deputy, the learning curve is real; Connecteam feels more intuitive for casual users.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.6 (1,000 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.2 (380 reviews analyzed)

Buddy Punch is a clean, straightforward time-tracking tool. Companies bring it up when Connecteam’s broader toolkit feels like more than they need. If a team just wants accurate punches, GPS, and simple approvals, Buddy Punch is usually on the shortlist.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Buddy Punch is laser-focused on attendance; Connecteam wraps attendance into a larger workflow suite.
• Connecteam supports more operational tasks, training, and forms.
• Buddy Punch tends to be easier for managers who only want audit-ready timesheets.
• Connecteam offers richer employee communication tools, which Buddy Punch doesn’t emphasize.
• Pricing is simpler with Buddy Punch for pure time tracking; Connecteam’s value comes from its breadth.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.8 (480 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.4 (130 reviews analyzed)

WhenToWork is one of those tools people either love or bounce off. Its interface isn’t flashy, but its scheduling logic runs deep, especially for teams with complicated coverage rules. It gets compared to Connecteam by managers who care more about schedule precision than broader workforce tools.

How it differs from Connecteam

• WhenToWork has more granular scheduling rules; Connecteam covers more use cases beyond scheduling.
• Connecteam’s user experience feels more modern, especially on mobile.
• WhenToWork specializes in solving tricky staffing puzzles; Connecteam aims for operational breadth.
• Learning curve is higher with WhenToWork; Connecteam is more approachable.
• Connecteam has built-in communication tools that WhenToWork doesn’t try to replicate.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.5 (220 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.1 (90 reviews analyzed)

Shiftbase has an interesting mix of scheduling, time tracking, and basic HR features. Companies switching from Connecteam sometimes like that it's a bit more structured in absence and leave management. It tends to appeal to European SMBs, though it’s making its way elsewhere.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Shiftbase builds stronger HR-lite features (like leave management) into its core.
• Connecteam’s communication and task flows are more day-to-day friendly.
• Shiftbase reports feel more structured; Connecteam makes customization easier.
• Connecteam has better training and form-building options.
• Shiftbase’s onboarding feels slightly more formal, which some teams prefer.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.3 (310 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.0 (180 reviews analyzed)

Clockify comes up when teams want detailed time analytics above anything else. It’s popular with agencies, engineers, and remote teams that care about project hours more than shift work. Compared to Connecteam, it’s a very different flavor, but the overlap is time tracking.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Clockify’s reporting depth is far stronger for projects.
• Connecteam handles scheduling better; Clockify barely touches that area.
• Clockify appeals to knowledge workers; Connecteam leans toward frontline teams.
• Connecteam offers operations tools Clockify doesn’t attempt.
• Clockify’s free tier draws in small teams comparing costs.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.5 (1,400 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 4.2 (350 reviews analyzed)

UKG Pro is a full HCM platform, so it’s in a different category entirely. It enters the conversation when companies outgrow frontline tools and start hunting for deeper HR, payroll, and talent systems. Larger organizations making serious HRIS investments often compare it with Connecteam to understand where each sits.

How it differs from Connecteam

• UKG Pro covers enterprise HR, payroll, performance, and more; Connecteam is an operations platform.
• Connecteam is far easier to deploy and maintain.
• UKG Pro handles complex compliance and reporting at scale.
• Connecteam is more affordable and practical for hourly teams.
• UKG Pro requires heavier implementation, something smaller teams rarely want.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.2 (1,600 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 3.7 (260 reviews analyzed)

Hubstaff sits in the time tracking + productivity monitoring niche. Distributed teams bring it up when Connecteam’s feature set feels too operations-oriented and they need monitoring features like screenshots or activity levels. It’s a different mindset, more about visibility and accountability than shift work.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Hubstaff offers monitoring features Connecteam doesn’t touch.
• Connecteam’s scheduling is significantly stronger.
• Hubstaff suits remote knowledge workers; Connecteam suits deskless teams.
• Connecteam’s communication tools reduce the need for monitoring in some cultures.
• Hubstaff’s reports skew productivity-focused rather than operational.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.3 (450 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 3.9 (200 reviews analyzed)

Bitrix24 tends to come up when a company wants more than workforce management. It’s a wide-ranging platform with CRM, tasks, chat, document storage, and some HR workflows all under one umbrella.

Teams that compare it to Connecteam are usually looking to consolidate tools or want a single system that mixes operational work with customer-facing processes.

How it differs from Connecteam

• Bitrix24 tries to be an all-in-one workspace (CRM, projects, chat); Connecteam focuses on frontline operations.
• Connecteam’s scheduling and time tools are far easier for hourly teams; Bitrix24 isn’t built around shifts.
• Bitrix24 suits teams that want deeper project/task structure; Connecteam keeps workflows lighter for faster adoption.
• Connecteam handles mobile-first use cases better, especially for on-the-go workers.
• Bitrix24 can feel overwhelming because of its breadth, while Connecteam tends to stay cleaner and more guided.
• Reporting in Bitrix24 leans more toward CRM/task visibility; Connecteam’s reports are tuned for daily operations.

Overall Score & Reviews Summary

• G2 Score: 4.1 (570 reviews analyzed)
• Trustpilot Score: 3.8 (190 reviews analyzed)